Tuesday, 3 August 2010
Dear Diary,
I forgot to scribble about some recent exhibitions I had seen.
John Buckley presented new works by Emma van Leest and Christian Lock in June.
Christian Lock’s paintings are elegant, minimal, abstract meditations with subtle colour variations interspersed with deliciously thick blobs of paint reminiscent of Jules Olitski’s 1960s experimentations. While the gallery sheet indicated that each painting is supposed to have shown the artist’s environmental concerns, these were not evident in the paintings. Normally, I rebel against the works which I perceive as being purely decorative. However, I found the calm and contemplative beauty of Lock’s creations disarming. [Price Guide: $4,000-$6,000]
Emma van Leest continues working with silhouette cut-outs. Her mastery and craftsmanship in this medium are superb and faultless. The works are evocative of vignette-like 18th and 19th-century silhouettes, by which van Leest is clearly inspired. The artist’s recent overseas trips have resulted in the appearance of Eastern motives within her work. However, executed on larger than usual scale, I feel the works have lost some of their earlier charm and intimacy.
Everything in van Leest’s works is whimsical, peaceful, and playful. One cannot detect the tiniest bit of conflict or drama within them. Let me elaborate. In 2004, Lisa Roet took an inspiration from traditional stained glass windows in order to narrate the story of Ham, the first chimp in space in 20th-Century comic-book style. In 2008, Mark Hilton adapted most remarkably the style of 17th-century Indian Mughal miniature painting in order to depict the then recent outbreaks of violence against women in Sydney. In comparison to the above, van Leest’s works neither add nor contemporise the traditional art of silhouette cut-outs, and thus appear escapist and indulgent by comparison. [Price Guide: $7,700]
Also in June, Lara Merrett presented a strong body of work at Karen Woodbury’s. I suspect I am not the only one who, upon seeing her paintings, was moved to exclaim: “Dale Frank!” At first glance, there is indeed a sense of commonality between the two artists, as both use large, sweeping, vibrant pools of paint. However, the differences become apparent upon a closer examination. Merrett predominantly uses acrylics, which result in a flatter, less glossy appearance of her works. Furthermore, if Frank’s paintings are the result of poured and manipulated liquid pigments, to the best of my observations, Merrett combines pouring as well as actual brush application. These are further embellished by finely executed dot and spider web motives which sporadically appear throughout the paintings and are not immediately apparent. While I would declare such works as Side by Side, In Your Face, and Last One Out as superb, there are still a few muddy passages within her paintings. However, given the artist’s youth, I am certain that these less than auspicious pigment combinations will be further resolved as her career progresses. [Price Guide: $14,000-$18,000]

I could not buy into the enthusiastic reception, which surrounded the latest body of photographic works by Jill Orr at her recent Vision exhibition at Jenny Port’s in June. As I was gazing at a group photo of school children, whose faces were covered with white clay, one name was screaming back at me… Marlene Dumas (while individual photographs of the same children are strongly reminiscent of Warren Brenninger’s works). Orr, in my opinion, remains one of the most outstanding and remarkable performance artists in Australia, and I am still haunted by the visions of her Bleeding Trees, Exhume the Grave, and the most recent Faith in Faithless Land images. Hence, I felt slightly disappointed by Vision in the context of the artist’s previous highly-imaginative and original performances and photographic exhibitions. [Price Guide: $2,500]
[© Eugene Barilo v. Reisberg 2010. This article is copyright, but the full or partial use is WELCOME with the full and proper acknowledgment]